Injured worker sues Matteson Marine Service
An injured worker has sued Matteson Marine Service, alleging that the company failed to provide him a safe workplace. According to the lawsuit, the worker was injured because Matteson Marine Service was negligent.
The worker also claims that the company failed to provide him with maintenance and cure. Or, put another way, that they failed to pay him any money while he was recuperating and failed to pay for his medical treatment.
You can read more about the case by clicking here.
What do you think about companies that fail to pay for proper medical care when an employee is injured?
Should the worker just "suck it up" and go back to work? Or should the company provide the best care possibl since the worker was hurt at work?
We welcome your comments.
********************************
Want to know more about offshore injury claims?
Below are some links to some suggested articles offering helpful tips and advice regarding offshore injury claims.
Curious about the Jones Act? Click here for a general overview of the Jones Act.
Want to know more about the Longshore and Harbor Worker's Compensation Act? Click here to read the article "What is a Longshoreman and What Are Their Legal Rights When Injured?
Want to know the difference between the Jones Act and the Longshore and Harbor Worker's Compensation Act? Click here to read about the difference between the two.
What to know the truth about offshore injury cases? Click here to read The Truth About Offshore Injury Claims.
Want to know what you should do after an offshore injury to preserve your legal rights? Click here to read What Should You Do If You Are Injured Offshore
If you are hurt and your employer is giving you a hard time, click here to read "I was injured on the job and my employer is giving me a hard time - What should I do"
Employer trying to get you to give a recorded statement? Click here to learn the truth about recorded statements and the best way to handle this request.
Thinking about trying to settle your offshore injury case without talking to a lawyer first? Click here to learn why you can settle some cases yourself but in other cases not having a lawyer may be a TERRIBLE MISTAKE.
Want to know what happens when you file an offshore injury or Jones Act case? Click here to learn about Filing a Jones Act lawsuit.
Click here to learn about 6 Critical Things you must know if you are Injured At Sea
Your employer may be keeping secrets from you if you are hurt offshore. Click here to read about The Secrets Your Employer May Not Want You To Know If You Are Injured Offshore.
The injured worker should not have to just "suck it up". Despite, or perhaps because of, advances in technology, the offshore industry is the most dangerous industry in which to work. Yet, rather than provide proper care to injured seamen and other offshore workers, the companies discourage them from making a claim for the benefits which they require to recover from their injuries.
Our firm represented a man who was crushed between a fixed crane and a tugger (air-winch) installed aboard the employer's vessel. The defendant employer had installed the tugger within the turn radius of the crane, creating a pinch point between the counterweight of the crane and a protective frame surrounding the tugger. The accident caused severe trauma to the seaman's anus, perineum, and rectum, internal organs, and left hip, resulting in the installation of an artificial bowel sphincter. The man has undergone over forty surgical procedures, including the creation and reversal of a colostomy and numerous debridements under anesthesia. The Jones Act seaman still suffers with severe scarring of his anus and rectum and damage to the sciatic nerve, causing uncontrolled chronic pain.
In addition to maintenance and cure benefits in excess of $1 million, we obtained $10.5 million for the seaman in settlement of his claim for damages against the employer under the Jones Act.
We worked diligently throughout the claim to ensure that the man received all the necessary treatment for his serious injuries.
Kevin--
I appreciate your comments and agree with you.
Sounds like your firm did a terrific job for your client under very difficult circumstances!