I was injured on a spar. Is a spar a Jones Act "vessel?"

The answer to this question after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Stewart v. Dutra, 543 U.S. 481 (2005) and the Fifth Circuit's decision in Holmes v. Atlantic Sounding Co., 437 F.3d 441 (5th Cir. 2006) is almost certainly yes. 

    But if the lawyer representing the injured person isn't familiar with these case or hasn't handled Jones Act cases on a regular basis, then the injured Jones Act seaman or spar worker runs the risk of losing this issue and losing substantial and valuable Jones Act rights and remedies.

    To recover under the Jones Act, an injured person must establish that he is a Jones Act seaman.  To be a Jones Act seaman, the injured person must prove that his duties "contribute to the function of the vessel or to the accomplishment of its mission.  See Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347, 359 (1995).  Second, the injured person must have a connection to a vessel or fleet of vessels that is substantial in terms of its duration and nature.  Id.

    After Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co., 543 U.S. 481, the Fifth Circuit adopted the definition of "vessel" set forth in Title 1, United States Code, Section 3 for all Jones Act claims.  That provision defines "vessel" as any watercraft "practically capable of maritime transportation, regardless of its primary purpose or state of transit at a particular moment."  This makes the Fifth Circuit's definition of "vessel" extremely broad for Jones Act purposes.

    In the Holmes case, the Fifth Circuit was tasked with determining if a quarterbarge was a vessel.  The Fifth Circuit had previously decided, 16 years earlier, that a quarterbarge was not a Jones Act vessel.  In Homes, the court reversed that ruling. 

    Most spars possess a number of objective vessel criteria.  For instance, most spars have a hull, specific displacement, decks, crew quarters.  Most spars float in navigable waters.  The Coast Guard regulates most spars, and often requires that certain job positions be licensed.  Most spars are towed to location or are able to move themselves.  And most spars are not permanently affixed to one spot in the water.  They are mobile.

    In summary, most spars should qualify as Jones Act vessels after Steward v. Dutra and Homes v. Atlantic Sounding.

    To learn more about the Jones Act and maritime law injury claims, please review the rest of this website or visit our main website at www.vbattorneys.com.  Or call for a free consultation with one of the firm's founding partners.

     

   

The Jones Act - Some "Secrets" Your Employer May Not Want You To Know If You Are Injured Offshore

    If you are injured offshore and qualify as a Jones Act seaman (you can read more about the Jones Act and Jones Act seaman status in other entries on this website), some employers will treat you honestly and fairly, provide independent medical advice and care, ensure that you recover from your injuries before requiring you to come back to work, and provide you and your family with appropriate payments while you recover from your injuries. 

    However, sometimes Jones Act employers will try to "trick" you into believing things about your case and your situation that simply aren't true, or are extremely misleading.  Almost every single Jones Act employer will have lawyers and insurance adjusters ready to provide them with advice.  Sometimes, they will attempt to get you to do takes actions that hurt your case and before you have the benefit of independent legal advice. 

    The following are some common tricks used by offshore employers that you should be aware of and that should cause "red flags" to come up:

1.  Injured Jones Act workers ARE NOT required to give a recorded statement. 

     The Jones Act does not require injured seamen to give a recorded statement to the employer or its insurance representatives.  While you should certainly report the accident immediately and in compliance with company procedures, you are simply not required to give a recorded statement.  If your employer or its insurance representatives tell you that you are required to give a recorded statement, you should be very suspicious.  In fact, the employer may try to get you to say things that may hurt your case later on.  And once it's recorded, you will have a lot of trouble later on if you were tricked into saying things you didn't mean. 

    Bottom line:  Be very careful about giving any recorded statement before you get independent legal advice.

2.  Injured Jones Act seamen ARE NOT required to sign any paperwork in exchange for getting medical benefits or maintenance payments. 

    Recently, some Jones Act employers have started requiring, or strongly suggesting, that injured seamen sign papers before they get medical benefits, maintenance, or "advances" on their personal injury settlements.  This is NOT required under the Jones Act.  And it is almost always a big mistake to sign such paperwork before consulting with independent, non-company affiliated lawyers. 

    Why is this a big mistake?  Because Jones Act employers often bury arbitration clauses or other language in this paperwork, and some courts have actually been enforcing these arbitrations clauses or waivers.  What does it mean to sign and be bound by an arbitration clause?  It means you may be forever giving up your right to a trial in Court, and instead, you may be agreeing to have your case heard by an arbitrator in a venue that is hand-picked by your employer.  Almost always a bad idea.

    If your employer requires you to sign paperwork after you're injured, you should STRONGLY consider having the paperwork reviewed by an independent, non-company affiliated lawyer to make absolutely sure you are not giving up important legal rights.

3.  Injured Jones Act seamen ARE NOT required to see company doctors. 

    Contrary to popular opinion, if you are injured offshore, you are not required to see only company-selected doctors.  You should pick a doctor who you like, with whom you are comfortable, and who treats you fairly and appropriately.   Unfortunately, some company-affiliated medical providers will try to force you back to work before you are ready, and will avoid performing tests that reveal the true extent of any possible injury.  Bottom line here is that you are allowed to select your own doctors.  If your Jones Act employer says you are required to go to company-selected doctors only, they are wrong.

4.  Injured Jones Act seamen ARE entitled to medical benefits and maintenance regardless of fault

    If you are injured offshore and qualify as a Jones Act seaman, you are entitled to medical benefits and maintenance (so-called "maintenance and cure") regardless of who was at fault.  Unless you were injured off the job, or you intentionally caused your own injuries, your Jones Act employer must pay maintenance and cure until you reach maximum medical improvement.  If your Jones Act employer tells you the injury was "your fault," or wasn't the fault of the employer, and therefore they are not required to pay your medical benefits and maintenance while you recover, they are wrong on this as well, and you should seek independent legal advice immediately to ensure that you get appropriate medical treatment.

5.  Injured Jones Act seamen ARE entitled to bring claims for negligence and unseaworthiness against their employer if they were injured due to the employer's fault or negligence

    Injured Jones Act seamen are entitled to maintenance and cure regardless of fault.  in addition to no-fault maintenance and cure, injured Jones Act seamen can bring negligence claims and unseaworthiness claims against their employer if the employer's fault caused the injuries, if the vessel or rig was "unseaworthy," or if the employer otherwise caused or even contributed to the injuries. 

    If you can prove negligence or unseaworthiness, you may be entitled to future medical care beyond maximum medical improvement, lost wages both past and future, and pain and suffering and mental anguish damages.  But in these situations, you must prove fault, unlike maintenance and cure, which is no-fault.

    Some Jones Act or maritime employers may tell you that maintenance and cure is all you get.  Don't listen to this nonsense.  If there is negligence or fault, the law says you have a right to bring a negligence or unseaworthiness cause of action under the Jones Act, if you are a seaman.

    Conclusion

    The five issues above are just a few examples of commonly misunderstood legal issues arising in Jones Act injury cases.  There are many more common tactics and misunderstandings that are listed above.  I will continue to update this website with more examples as appropriate, so make sure to check back often for updates on these and other important Jones Act and maritime law topics.

    In the meantime, trust your own common sense.  If you are a Jones Act seaman and are injured offshore, and something just doesn't "smell right," it probably isn't.  If you see red flags or something happens that causes you to be suspicious, you should strongly consider getting a free consultation from an experienced Jones Act attorney.  Most competent Jones Act attorneys will give you a no-charge free consultation and let you know whether your Jones Act employer is trying to trick you or not.  When things don't "seem right," they usually aren't.  Trust your gut.

Injured seamen are entitled to maintenance and cure, and unearned wages, regardless of fault

Injured seamen are entitled to maintenance, cure and unearned wages.  However, some Jones Act employers refuse to pay maintenance, cure and/or unearned wages.

Injured seamen can bring claims beyond the traditional worker's compensation remedies.  Specifically, injured seamen are entitled to payment for related medical treatment, payment of compensation during their period of disability, and payment of unearned wages.  In addition to these worker's compensation-type remedies, injured seamen can also bring negligence claims and unseaworthiness claims against their employer.

The rest of this post explains the entitlement to maintenance and cure and unearned wages in more detail:

Entitlement to Maintenance and Cure Generally

A seamen's employer is responsible for paying maintenance and cure for an injury or illness that occurs in the course and scope of an injured seaman's employment.  This is a centuries-old obligation and arises from the employment relationship between the injured seaman and his or her employer.  The obligation to pay maintenance and cure arises irrespective of fault or negligence.

A seaman is also entitled to unearned wages from his employer until he or she is fit for duty or they are no longer disabled.

The right to "Maintenance."

Maintenance is designed to compensate an injured seaman for room and board he would have received on the vessel had he or she not been injured.

Generally, maintenance payments range between $15 - $40 per day.  Many lawyers for injured seaman have argued for higher maintenance payments, but courts have not been particularly receptive to this argument.

The obligation to pay maintenance continues until the seaman reaches "maximum medical improvement," which is defined as the point at which all future medical care is "palliative" in nature only.

The right to "Cure."

Cure means medical treatment.  Like maintenance, cure is not dependent on negligence or fault.  A seamen is entitled to cure until he reaches maximum medical improvement.  Injured seamen must mitigate their medical expenses to the extent possible, but the seaman's employer bears the burden to prove that medical expenses are excessive or unreasonable or unnecessary.

The right to "Unearned Wages."

Seamen are entitled to wages they would have earned had they not been injured.  For example, if a seaman is injured at the beginning of his or her work on an offshore mobile drilling rig or a ship, he or she will be entitled to what they would have been paid had the injury not occurred.

The right to maintenance and cure should be resolved in favor of injured seaman.
 
The law on a seaman's entitlement to maintenance and cure is well-settled.  Courts have consistenly held that all doubts or ambiguities with respect to entitlement to maintenance and cure should be resolved in favor of the injured seaman. 

If an employer wrongfully or willfully denies maintenance and cure, they may be required to pay an injured seaman's attorney fees for obtaining maintenance and cure.

Conclusion.

Injured seaman are entitled to maintenance, cure, and unearned wages regardless of fault or negligence if they are injured or contract an illness while in the service of a ship.  However, some employers refuse to provide maintenance, cure, and unearned wages.  This is unfortunate but all too common.

Like any maritime dispute, an injured seaman should consider consulting an experienced maritime lawyer if his or her employer wrongfully refuses to live up to their maintenance, cure, and unearned wages.