Jones Act Barge Lawsuit Claims That Company Failed to Provide a Safe Place to Work

A barge worker's widow recently filed a lawsuit against a barge company and a contracting company after her husband was killed. 

In the lawsuit, the widow claims that her deceased husband died when he slipped and fell on an icy barge.  The barge was empty.  The lawsuit claims that the barge company failed to provide the worker with a safe place to work.

About this case and maritime wrongful death claims

Under maritime law, the direct descendents of deceased workers may be able to bring claims for wrongful death.  Under most claims, the survivors must prove that the company did something "negligent" to cause the death or that the vessel was "unseaworthy" and that caused the subject accident or death.  The damages available differ depending on a lot of factors, but if the survivors were financially dependent on the deceased worker, they generally can collect damages for the loss of financial support.

The negligence standards differ depending on whether the case is a Jones Act case, a Longshore and Harbor Worker's Compensation Act case, a General Maritime Law case, or some other case.

Most of the time, only an experienced maritime and Jones Act lawyer will be able to tell you what law you can file under and what claims you can bring. 

Most important, don't trust the insurance company to tell you your rights. 
Hire your own independent lawyer to advise you.

Barge Worker Brings Jones Act Injury Case Against Teco Barge Lines

A barge worker who was working on a Teco Barge Line vessel on the Mississippi River has filed a Jones Act case against his employer for his injuries.

According to the lawsuit, the worker suffered serious and permanent hip injuries in March 2006.  He claims that the company failed to provide him with safe equipment, proper assistance, and competent supervision.  The worker claims damages for lost wages, human damages like pain and suffereing, and medical expenses.

Comment from Texas Jones Act and Maritime Lawyer Brian Beckcom:

If you are a "seaman" as that term is defined in the Jones Act, your employer is REQUIRED to pay your medical bills until you reach "maximum medical improvement" and also is REQUIRED to pay your "maintenance," which is a daily monetary amount that is supposed to provide for your living and lodging and food expenses while you recuperate from your injuries.

If you are an offshore worker who is a Jones Act "seaman," and your employer is NOT paying your medical bills or maintenance, they are not following the law. 

BP Texas City refinery, and other BP refineries, continue to be the nationa's deadliest

The Houston Chronicle has an interesting article about British Petroleum and its safety record in today's edition.

Even after killing 15 people and injuring hundreds in 2005 at its Texas City refinery, and pleading guilty to a felony as a result of its conduct leading up to that explosion, BP apparently has not learned its lesson.

According to the Houston Chronicle, since the 2005 explosion, BP's Texas City refinery  is still the nation's most dangerous. 

You can read the full article by clicking here.

For some reason, the federal government apparently believes that a $50 million dollar fine for BP's felonious conduct would be sufficient punishment.

(Tell that to the parents, siblings, and children of the 15 people killed in 2005 and the 4 people killed since then.)

Many safety focused attorneys have objected to the proposed fine as too lenient.  Why?

Simply put, it is too lenient.  A $50 million dollar fine for BP (which is worth billions) is like a fine of less than one penny for someone with ten dollars.  It's just not high enough to have any deterrent effect.  It doesn't register.

Rather than have a meaningless, arbitrary fine, that will have a minimal effect on BP's bottom line, some people have suggested that the fine should be tied in some way connected to BP's net worth or profits.  That is the only way for the fine to have any "bite" to it.  Otherwise, the fine is basically meaningless.

What do you think?  Feel free to comment below.