Maritime Injury Lawyer & Attorney : Vujasinovic & Beckcom : Jones Act : Serving Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi

According to reports, a worker for New Port Building and Construction obtained a $1.47 million dollar settlement after he was paralyzed while working at the company president's personal residence.

The insurance company discovered after the accident that the injured worker had not filled out the proper insurance forms before the accident.

One of the most important things consumers must remember when purchasing insurance is to be honest and forthright on the application and to fill it out completely.  Do not fail to list information you think may increase your premium slightly or leave out requested information.  If you do, you run the risk of losing coverage for a later accident or covered claim.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

In Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Sorrell, 127 S.Ct. 799 (2007), the Supreme Court held that the causation standard for an injured railroad worker's conduct (and presumably Jones Act seamen) is the same causation standard for the employer's conduct.

This opinion surprised some.  Many lawyers assumed that railroads, and Jones Act employers, generally had a higher burden because they generally had more control and knowledge than an injured railroad worker or Jones Act seaman.

While the Court did not say what the causation standard should be, a separate opinion by Souter, Scalia, and Alito suggested that is should be the same common law proximate cause standard.

The Norfolk Southern case, while not game-changing, certainly changes the causation standard perspective in FELA case (and, presumably, Jones Act cases case well.

For more information about the Jones Act or General Maritime Law, please contact Brian Beckcom at 713.224.7800, or toll free at 877.724.7800, or visit one of the firm's websites:

www.vbattorneys.com
www.themaritimelawyer.com
www.maritimeaccidentattorney.com

***************

About the firm

Vujasinovic & Beckcom, P.L.L.C. is a firm of board certified personal injury trial lawyers who handle serious injury and death cases, as well as business and insurance cases, on a contingency fee basis.  The firm has a substantial docket of Jones Act and maritime injury cases.

***************

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Workers who load and unload the ship's cargo and are employed by stevedoring companies, longshoremen or harbor worker unions, or who are employed by such companies other than the ship's owners are generally considered "longshoremen"  or "harbor workers."

Longshoremen are covered by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA).  They are entitled to a form of federal workers' compensation benefits for on-the-job injuries or death.  Longshoremen are entitled to collect benefits if they were injured in the course of their employment regardless of fault.

Longshoremen are not entitled to bring Jones Act or General Maritime Law claims against their employer.  The U.S. Supreme Court has made it very clear that an injured worker cannot be a Longshoremen and a Jones Act seaman at the same time.  The two laws, and the money compensation they allow, are mutually exclusive.

Although a Longshoremen cannot sue his employer, he may be able to sue the shipowner for negligence.  Shipowners have a duty to ensure that the ship's equipment, tools, work spaces and other areas are safe from dangers.  Shipowners must warn longshoremen/stevedores of any dangerous conditions on their ships.  If the shipowner fails to warn a longshormen/stevedore of a dangerous condition and the longshoremen/stevedore is hurt as a result, the shipowner may be responsible for the longshoreman's damages.  See, for example, Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los Santos (1981) 451 US 156, 68 L.Ed 2d 1, 101S Ct 1614).

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks